Clifford Nass was a researcher at Stanford University who
analyzed how well humans actually multitasked with technology in our daily
lives. His research showed that although
a lot of people think they are good at multitasking, his tests showed they we
are not as good as we think. He conducted a study where he had to subject
groups; those who do a lot of multitasking, and those who do little. His
results suggested that individuals who frequently use multiple media approach
fundamental can multitask information-processing activities differently than
those who consume multiple media streams much less frequently…those who
infrequently multitask are more effective at volitionally allocating their
attention in the face of distractions (Ophir, Nass, Wagner, 2009).
I do agree with Nass with the idea that people do indeed
think that they are good at multitasking in their lives. For example as I write
this paper I am listening to music, switching back and forth between articles,
checking email, and have Family Guy playing in the background. I know with so
many distractions in front of me that I can’t possibly have one hundred percent
attention to this paper at all times, however I do think multitasking is a
beneficial attribute to our workforce.
In a world with countless information being exchanged,
digested, and spat back out, I would argue that it is near impossible to not
multitask in today’s cyberspace environment. I believe time is the biggest
enforcer of multitasking, its time that determines whether we do this paper now
or another assignment for a different class. Its time that makes us choose to
not read an entire article but snippets from multiple sources, not knowing if
reading from just one information source will be sufficient enough to complete
the task at hand. With respects to time, I feel that humans are excellent at
multitasking. With time being such a scarce resource, we must try and find only
the most important information out there through various technological mediums.
To further show my beleif that we are increasing our powers in the multitasking spectrum, I found a TED talk that backs up my argument. Gabe Zichermann explains that the new generation today are multitasking far better than their parents had to while playing video games. The example that he gives is that early game systems only had one or two buttons to communicate controls to the game. whereas in today games such as World of Warcraft, there is upwards of 30 different keys plays are using simultaneously while talking and listening (If you are interested in the TED talk).
To further show my beleif that we are increasing our powers in the multitasking spectrum, I found a TED talk that backs up my argument. Gabe Zichermann explains that the new generation today are multitasking far better than their parents had to while playing video games. The example that he gives is that early game systems only had one or two buttons to communicate controls to the game. whereas in today games such as World of Warcraft, there is upwards of 30 different keys plays are using simultaneously while talking and listening (If you are interested in the TED talk).
Nass said that we are, “distracting ourselves to death”.
I believe that we are doing the opposite in that technology has actually
expanded our ability to live our lives the way that we want. Although Facebook
has made great strides in creating identity on the web, the vast majority of
the Internet is still very ominous. Where people have the opportunity to
portray themselves however they want. Furthermore, I believe that the internet
has made social communication stronger even in real life interaction because
the accessibility to information the web brings people. It is much easier to
stay up on current events, know the current score to games, and keep your
finances in order all before breakfast.
“Always On” is the concept that an individual is always
connected to the Internet through technology. Meaning that they’re always
connected to their peers, their work, etc. This is an interesting idea for me
personally because I don’t think it is just black and white. There are days
when I am talking to multiple people on my phone, checking email and social
media on my computer, and listening to music on my Ipod. There are also the
days where I barely look at my phone, don’t turn on my computer, and enjoy
being cut off from all the media. I believe it depends on what that particular
day has in store for us. Do we have a ton to get done? Or do we have a relaxing
day ahead of us?
Nass’ statement that “we cannot possibly multitask, the
sociological literature proves this” is accurate to a degree. In my life, if I
am having a genuine conversation with someone I will put my phone away because
I was brought up that it is rude to not give someone your full attention when
they are addressing you. However, I can think of times when I am sitting around
with my friends and someone asks me a question where I was to involved with my
phone to give them an answer. I feel
that woman have multitasking forced onto them through cultural views the worst.
Like we mentioned in class, a working woman with a family is not only expected
to focus on her work, but also take care of children, cook, and clean the house
traditionally. With this example I do
agree highly with Nass in that it does not see possible that women could juggle
so many tasks at once.
No comments:
Post a Comment